A virtual mother-infant postpartum psychotherapy group for mothers with a history of adverse childhood experiences: open-label feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: Mothers with a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) are at elevated risk for postpartum mental illness and impairment in the mother-infant relationship. Interventions attending to maternal-infant interactions may improve outcomes for these parents and their children, but barriers to accessing in-person postpartum care limit uptake. We adapted a postpartum psychotherapy group for mothers with mental illness (e.g., mood, anxiety, trauma-related disorders) and ACE for live video-based delivery, and evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in an open-label pilot study. METHODS: We recruited adults with children (6-18 months) from a perinatal psychiatry program in Toronto, Canada. The intervention was a live video-based 12-week interactive psychotherapy group focused on maternal symptoms and maternal-infant relationships. The primary outcome was feasibility, including feasibility of recruitment and retention, fidelity of the intervention, and acceptability to patients and group providers. Maternal clinical outcomes were compared pre- to post-intervention, as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We recruited 31 participants (mean age 36.5 years (SD 3.9)) into 6 groups; 93.6% (n = 29) completed post-group questionnaires, and n = 20 completed an optional post-group acceptability interview. Mean weekly group attendance was 83% (IQR 80-87); one participant (3.2%) dropped out. All group components were implemented as planned, except for dyadic exercises where facilitator observation of dyads was replaced with unobserved mother-infant exercises followed by in-group reflection. Participant acceptability was high (100% indicated the virtual group was easy to access, beneficial, and reduced barriers to care). Mean maternal depressive [Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: 14.6 (SD 4.2) vs. 11.8 (SD 4.2), paired t, p = 0.005] and post-traumatic stress [Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5: 35.5 (SD 19.0) vs. 27.1 (SD 16.7)], paired t, p = 0.01] symptoms were significantly lower post vs. pre-group. No differences were observed on mean measures of anxiety, emotion regulation or parenting stress. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and retention met a priori feasibility criteria. There were significant pre- to post-group reductions in maternal depressive and post-traumatic symptoms, supporting proceeding to larger-scale implementation and evaluation of the intervention, with adaptation of dyadic exercises.

Framing the work: A coparenting model for guiding infant mental health engagement with families.

When working with families of infants and toddlers, intentionally looking beyond dyadic child-parent relationship functioning to conceptualize the child's socioemotional adaptation within their broader family collective can enhance the likelihood that clinical gains will be supported and sustained. However, there has been little expert guidance regarding how best to frame infant-family mental health therapeutic encounters for the adults responsible for the child's care and upbringing in a manner that elevates their mindfulness about and their resolve to strengthen the impact of their coparenting collective. This article describes a new collaborative initiative organized by family-oriented infant mental health professionals across several different countries, all of whom bring expansive expertise assessing and working with coparenting and triangular family dynamics. The Collaborative's aims are to identify a means for framing initial infant mental health encounters and intakes with families with the goal of assessing and raising family consciousness about the relevance of coparenting. Initial points of convergence and growing points identified by the Collaborative for subsequent field study are addressed.

Cuando se trabaja con familias de infantes y niños pequeñitos, el mirar intencionalmente más allá del funcionamiento de la relación diádica niño-progenitor para conceptualizar la adaptación socioemocional del niño dentro de la amplitud del colectivo familiar puede mejorar la posibilidad de que los logros clínicos sean apoyados y mantenidos. Sin embargo, ha habido poca guía de expertos acerca de cómo enmarcar mejor los encuentros terapéuticos infante-familia de salud mental para los adultos que son responsables del cuidado y crianza del niño de una manera que se eleve su estado consciente acerca de y su determinación de reforzar el impacto del colectivo en el proceso de la crianza compartida. Este artículo describe una nueva iniciativa colaborativa organizada por profesionales de la salud mental infantil orientados hacia la familia en varios diferentes países, todos los cuales aportan su conocimiento amplio evaluando y trabajando con las dinámicas familiares de crianza compartida y triangular. Las metas de este esfuerzo Colaborativo son identificar un medio para enmarcar los encuentros y la proporción de salud mental infantil con familias que se proponen evaluar y crear consciencia familiar acerca de la relevancia de la crianza compartida. Se abordan los puntos iniciales de convergencia y puntos de crecimiento identificados por el esfuerzo Colaborativo para subsecuentes estudios en el campo.

En travaillant avec des familles de nourrissons et de petits enfants, le fait de regarder délibérément au- delà du fonctionnement de la relation dyadique enfant-parent afin de conceptualisation l'adaptation socio émotionnelle de l'enfant, au sein de leur collectif familial plus large, peut accroître la probabilité que les gains cliniques seront bien soutenus et prolongés. Cependant il y a eu peu de directive experte concernant la meilleure manière d'encadrer les rencontres thérapeutiques nourrisson-famille de santé mentale pour les adultes responsables du soin de l'enfant et de son éducation d'une manière qui élève la pleine conscience et la détermination qu'il y a à renforcer l'impact de leur coparentage collectif. Cet article décrit une nouvelle initiative collaborative organisée par des professionnels de la santé mentale du nourrisson centrés sur la famille au travers de plus pays différents, tous étant de grands experts évaluant et travaillant avec des dynamiques de coparentage et de famille triangulaire. Les buts de cette collaboration sont d'identifier un moyen d'encadrer des rencontres de santé mentale initiales et les apports des familles avec le but d'évaluer et d'améliorer la conscience de la famille quant à la pertinence du coparentage. Les premiers points de convergence et de développement identifiés par la collaboration pour des études sur le terrain à venir sont discutés.

An ultra-brief systemic intervention to address child mental health symptomatology.

Drawing on decades of research in family systems, coparenting, and developmental science, we present a clinical approach to address unmet service needs in children's mental health. Specifically, we describe Lausanne Family Play - Brief Intervention (LFP-B) - a manualized family systems approach providing a caregiver-caregiver-child therapy (and sibling/s, when applicable). The LFP-B is ultra-brief, typically delivered in as few as three sessions (two assessment sessions followed by a video feedback session), with the aim of reducing children's mental health symptomatology by enhancing the coparenting relationship. We review literature on systemic family therapies and provide a rationale for including coparents and children in child mental health care. We then provide a rationale for using behavioral observations and video feedback in treatment, drawing on research in related family-based treatments (e.g., parent-child therapies). Finally, we provide an overview of the LFP-B manual and a case illustration.

Reflective family play: A model for whole family intervention in the infant and preschool clinical population.

This article proposes a new treatment model, Reflective Family Play, for clinical intervention in two-parent families of children aged 0 to 5 years. It is play-based and grounded in the evidence-based treatment approach of Watch Wait and Wonder (WWW) as well as the assessment tool known as the Lausanne Family Play paradigm (LFP). WWW is a dyadic treatment for caregivers and their infants or preschoolers that has been shown to shift attachment in the very young (N.J. Cohen, E. Muir, & M. Lojkasek, 1999; N.J. Cohen, M. Lojkasek, E. Muir, R. Muir & C.J. Parker, 2002). The LFP is a more recent adaptation of the Lausanne Trilogue Play paradigm (LTP; E. Fivaz-Depeursinge & A. Corboz-Warnery, 1999). Together, the LTP/LFP have now been used for over 2 decades as reliable measures of the family alliance and interactions in two-parent households. By combining concepts from WWW and the LTP/LFP, a novel approach is presented for treatment in two-caregiver households. Clinical excerpts are used to illustrate.

Does the portal of entry determine our view? Interfaces between dyadic and three-way assessment of a clinical family transitioning to parenthood.

The purpose of this interface was to explore the influences of dyadic and three-way observation on clinical assessment of young families. Three independent clinicians observed a clinically referred family using semistructured play paradigms, each with only a limited view of the family. One had only the data on dyadic interactions, the second only had data on the family triad, and the third observed both the dyads and the triad. Interactions were scored using standardized measures as well as the clinical impressions of the three practitioners. The various ports of entry yielded similar impressions in some instances, but each port also provided a richness of information not available from the other portal. Clinical implications are discussed, including not only the benefits of each port for assessment but also the implications for therapy in this case example.